Rapid Retrieval:      
引用本文:
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   View/Add Comment  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 102次   下载 204 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
调谐质量阻尼器和轨道型非线性能量阱减震性能对比研究
吴春雷, 黄欣, 鲍天正, 张国军
上海师范大学 建筑工程学院, 上海 201418
摘要:
基于2层钢框架模型,通过试验对比了在地震作用下调谐质量阻尼器(TMD)和非线性能量阱(NES)的减震性能,分析了两者时(频)域曲线和减震效果的差异,探究了影响两者减震效果的因素. 试验结果表明:对于处在低阶模态的结构,TMD的减震效果更好,减小加速度响应最多可达42.5%;轨道型非线性能量阱因轨道摩擦系数不同减震效果有差异,减小加速度响应最多可达24.7%,但傅里叶幅值略有降低,高阶模态下减震效果将更好.
关键词:  调谐质量阻尼器(TMD)  轨道型非线性能量阱(NES)  结构响应  振动台试验
DOI:10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-5137.2024.03.017
分类号:TU352.11;TU317+.1
基金项目:
Comparison study of damping performance between tuned mass damper and track nonlinear energy sink
WU Chunlei, HUANG Xin, BAO Tianzheng, ZHANG Guojun
School of Civil Engineering, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 201418, China
Abstract:
Based on a 2-story steel frame model, the damping performance of tuned mass damper (TMD) and nonlinear energy sink (NES) under the seismic action was compared in shaking-table tests. Meanwhile, the differences in their time (frequency) domain curves as well as damping effects were analyzed. The factors affecting the damping performance were explored. The test results showed that for structures in low-order mode, TMD had a better damping effect with reducing the acceleration response by up to 42.5%; while track NES due to track friction different coefficients had different damping effects, and the acceleration response could be reduced by up to 24.7%. However, the Fourier amplitude was slightly reduced, which had the potential for better damping effects in high-order mode.
Key words:  tuned mass damper(TMD)  track nonlinear energy sink (NES)  structural response  shaking-table test