|
SAT II物理试卷与高考上海卷中力学部分的比较研究 |
Comparative Research on Testing of Mechanics in SAT II Physics and Physics Testing in University Entrance Exam |
|
DOI: |
中文关键词: 比较研究;物理考试;试题编制;SAT II |
英文关键词:comparative research, physics examination, questions establishment, SAT II |
基金项目:上海市教育委员会青年教师培养资助计划基金(B-9131-13-001025)和教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金(C-6160-14-001) |
作者 | 单位 | 赵振宇 | 上海师范大学 | 胡海涛 | 上海师范大学 |
|
摘要点击次数: 644 |
全文下载次数: 1411 |
中文摘要: |
文章比较研究了近5年来,上海高考物理试卷和美国SAT II物理试卷中的力学部分试题在结构、出题形式、数量和评价体系等方面的差异,发现中美两国对力学在物理学科大学入学考试中的重视程度相一致,而在知识点分配上存在差异。SAT II物理试卷中力学题目的整体数量超过上海高考物理试卷,平均每题的解答时间小于上海高考物理试卷,配合其特有倒扣分机制的选择题,事实上提高了评价的客观性和考试的难度。这对将来上海高考物理试卷的出题具有借鉴意义。 |
英文摘要: |
This paper presents a comparative study on the questions to mechanics in between College Entrance Examination of Shanghai (CEES) and SAT II physics test in the nearly five years, including test structure, questions forms, quantity, and evaluation criteria. It is found that the weight of mechanics is similar in both examinations, however, the distribution of knowledge are different. The question numbers of SAT II is larger than that of CEES, but the mean-time for answer is relatively shorter. Besides, the penalty for wrong answers increase the difficulty of SAT II physics test and make it much more objective for evaluation. It is helpful for the questions establishment for the CEES in the future. |
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
关闭 |