智能社会中技术治理与法律治理关系论纲

On the Relationship Between Technology Governance and Legal Governance in Intelligent Technology Society

中文关键词:  智能社会；技术治理；法律治理；互嵌耦合；关系模型；中国特色的关系模型

英文关键词:technology governance; legal governance; embedded coupling; relationship model; relationship model with Chinese characteristics

中文摘要:

      技术治理与法律治理关系问题是人类关于智能社会法治的最新思索和表达。智能技术被广泛应用于公共部门和商业场景，成为“技术治理”。世界各国都在探索技术治理与法律治理的关系，努力成为智能社会法治规则的制定者而不是接受者。智能社会中，技术治理与法律治理必然发生彼此内嵌、牵连、塑造、互释，我们既需要梳理技术治理对法律治理的赋能嵌入，也需要厘清法律治理对技术治理的归化嵌入。在探索技术治理与法律治理内部互嵌关系基础上，进一步探讨覆盖公、私场景中两者呈现出的全部关系模型。在公场景中各国一般均采“赋能模型”，在私场景中主采“单重模型”和“兼重模型”。不同模型的理论根基及实践目标各不相同，需分别对公、私场景中的各种外部关系模型开展理论溯源、实践观察及综合评价。这种“内外兼修”的梳理是为了更加深刻地追寻技术治理与法律治理关系问题的“中国选择”，探寻具有中国特色的社会主义法治理论与实践方案，从而形成中国话语权与理论自信。

英文摘要:

      The relationship between technology governance and legal governance is the latest thinking and expression of human beings on the rule of law in the intelligent technology society. Intelligent technology is widely used in the public sector and business scenarios, becoming “technology governance”. Countries around the world are exploring the relationship between technology governance and legal governance, striving to become the maker rather than the recipient of the rule of law in an intelligent society. In an intelligent society, technology governance and legal governance are bound to be embedded, implicated, shaped, and explained to each other. We not only need to sort out the embedding of technology governance in legal governance, but also clarify the naturalization and embedding of legal governance in technology governance. On the basis of exploring the inter-embedded relationship between technology governance and legal governance, this paper further explores all the relationship models covering both public and private scenarios. In the public scene, countries generally adopt the “enablement model”, while in the private scene, the “single model” and “dual model” are mainly adopted. Different models have different theoretical foundations and practical objectives. It is necessary to carry out theoretical traceability, practical observation, and comprehensive evaluation of various external relationship models in public and private scenes. This sort of “both internal and external cultivation” is to more deeply pursue the “Chinese choice” of the relationship between technology governance and legal governance, that is, in the public setting, China should choose a relational model that enables technology governance to empower legal governance, and in the private setting China should choose a “Hunran” matching model dominated by technology governance (new legal governance means) and supplemented by traditional legal governance means. On the basis of this relationship model structure, this paper explores the socialist rule of law theory and practice scheme with Chinese characteristics from the three dimensions of the refinement of the scene, optimization of technology governance and the synergy of traditional legal governance, so as to form China’s discourse power and theoretical self-confidence.