今天是
刑事司法领域自动化决策的风险与规制
The Risks and Regulation of Automated Decision Making in the Field of Criminal Justice
  
中文关键词:  自动化决策;刑事司法;预测性警务;智慧司法;证据审查
英文关键词:automated decision-making; criminal justice; predictive policing; smart justice; evidence review
项目:教育部高校人文社会科学重点研究基地重点项目“程序法治下的网络安全研究”(23JJD820004);北京外国语大学卓越人才支持计划
作者单位
郑曦 北京外国语大学 
摘要点击次数: 76
全文下载次数: 51
中文摘要:
      自动化决策在中外各国的刑事司法领域已有广泛应用,其原因在于自动化决策符合刑事司法预防和打击犯罪、提高诉讼效率、实现案件公正办理的需求,也有相应的观念和技术条件予以支持。然而自动化决策在刑事司法中的应用可能带来准确性不足、公正性偏离和机械性三方面的风险,应采取措施对自动化决策进行规制,以达到补足准确性、保障公正性和消解机械性的效果,实现自动化决策在刑事司法领域的法治化 应用。
英文摘要:
      Automated decision-making has been widely applied in the field of criminal justice both domestically and interna? tionally, as it aligns with the criminal justice’s needs of preventing and combating crime, improving litigation efficiency, and en? suring the fair handling of cases, supported by corresponding concepts and technological conditions. However, the application of automated decision-making in criminal justice may introduce risks related to accuracy, fairness, and ossification. Measures should be taken to regulate automated decision-making to compensate for accuracy, ensure fairness, and resolve ossification, thereby achieving the law-based application of automated decision-making in the field of criminal justice.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭