论牟宗三判定朱熹别子为宗的诠释漏洞

On Mou Zongsan’s Criticism on Zhu Xi’s Philosophy

中文关键词:  朱熹；别子为宗；牟宗三；诠释学

英文关键词:Zhu Xi, “being heretic to the authentic Confucian philosophy” (Biezi weizong), Mou Zongsan, hermeneutics

中文摘要:

      牟宗三关于朱熹“别子为宗”的论断构成其疏解整个宋明理学哲学思想的关键一环，进而构成其基于自身哲学体系对中国思想传统进行解释并寻求当代之解决方案的关键一环。牟宗三判定朱熹“别子为宗”，并不是简单地否定朱熹，我们甚至可以说，牟宗三是在“别子为宗”的论断下赋予了朱熹思想特别的意义。牟宗三判定朱熹“别子为宗”的诠释有无漏洞？这一判定是否符合思想史的真实？牟宗三视域中的朱熹是在怎样一种解释学背景下建立起来的？牟宗三判定朱熹“别子为宗”有什么深层内涵或“良苦用心”？从诠释学的视角解析这些问题，一方面可以厘清朱熹在中国思想史上的真正地位，从而为中国传统思想之发展“正本清源”；另一方面可以作为理解牟宗三哲学体系的钥匙，定位牟宗三在中国思想史发展进程中的独特贡献。

英文摘要:

      Mou Zongsan’s criticism on Zhu Xi’s philosophy as “being heretic to the authentic Confucian philosophy” (Biezi weizong) is one of important premises, on which Mou not only criticizes Song ming Neo Confucianism, but also evaluates the tradition of Chinese thought from his own philosophical perspective. Mou does not mean to deny the significance of Zhu Xi’s philosophy, and his interpretation bestows special meaning upon Zhu Xi’s philosophy. Is Mou’s interpretation consistent with the reality of the history of Chinese philosophy? How does Mou establish the image of Zhu Xi from his perspective of hermeneutics? Why does Mou make such an interpretation? The new hermeneutic way of interpretation in this paper clarifies Zhu Xi’s position in the history of Chinese philosophy. Meanwhile, the interpretation serves as a key to Mou’s philosophical system, and can help people to re evaluate Mou’s unique contribution to the development of Chinese intellectual history.